RT @therestofus5: Male privilege is writing an entire book about your dick, openly saying that you are a pervert and still having the academic world defend you if anybody dares to question your claim that you're a woman.
'I and me' https://t.co/DxnqmX...
RT @JessDeWahls: “..,it is lowering beyond words to see a serious publisher describe this ill-edited, ill-considered drivel as a manifesto for the cause. This isn’t feminism. This is a swizz” I laughed. And this from the guardian!! I’m slightly ...
RT @kateofdoom: Would have been easier just to say 'nope' https://t.co/Z6RsSE...
RT @rebelyarns: This is such a clear, well-evidenced and well-argued paper. It makes a calm, convincing and compassionate case for sex-based language when discussing birth and maternity. Brava! https://t.co/khSDBP...
RT @SinclairJM1987: Lorry Pennies: “at least the guardian will give me an arse licking sycophantic review right?” Sorry love! https://t.co/DQqxci...
RT @Psythor: I am extremely sceptical of claims that "Gender Critical" tweeters are bots https://t.co/iim5qi...
It would of course to be horrifying to define women by their reproductive function, and it is a massive leap into feminist Enlightenment to redefine us in law as 'the people who we presume get fucked.' https://t.co/3juTdw...
B/c some people being positioned as sexually passive and being reproductively exploited is entirely unrelated to the type of bodies they have, and the systems which enable the people with the other types of bodies to exploit them. ...
Because the people with the morphology that in an overwhelming number of cases directly corresponds to having XY chromosomes commit the overwhelming majority of violence against female people and consistently objectify and harass us sexually, you ...
How you can read an entire thread explicitly arguing that classification doesn't work by properties and not, therefore, by Platonic essence, and end up with 'it's Platonic essence' is just BEYOND. Because we just have to say exactly what you project. ...
Forming concepts isn't normative in this way. It's not a question of how we *should* classify things. We don't come along and say 'oh broken things should be a different class of things to things that work and so we should have different concepts for ...
We have asked a million times, and no one has given us an answer that isn't either circular or relies on stereotypes. 'A social construct that is an internal sense of identity' (roughly) is my favourite, from ONS. https://t.co/88H7He...
'Humans are sexed, and it matters.' Utterly impossible to verify or parse, I agree. https://t.co/t9Bp9M...
We mean 'reproductive function' Which, oh look, you kind of admitted you understand at the end of your tweet. And we're not reducing 'people' to their reproductive function. We're saying a person's sex is their reproductive function. Because um, ...