Dr. Jane Clare Jones

 

28 April 2021

 

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

25 posts today

RT @mopohanga: @morcette @janeclarejones You don't believe that "one is not born a woman, one is born a baby girl and grows up to become a woman with all the socialisation and expectations and rules and roles and stuff that goes along with that." ...

April 28th @ 3:27 pm |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

25 posts today

RT @kevin_ovenden: I suppose unintended but welcome consequence of #MayaAppeal today is some focus on Simone de Beauvoir. Don't take misconstruing by Judith Butler or others - or crass literalism - as guide. Listen to the woman herself. Kicks in at ...

April 28th @ 1:10 pm |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

25 posts today

RT @KJ_Harrison: So, all must be compelled to pretend sexual reality does not exist & in ALL circumstances, regardless of harms to women, or our very existence is under threat? What hyperbolic drivel! Weakening & toxifying the left by the ...

April 28th @ 12:28 pm |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

25 posts today

Tayler thought is was possible for women to express their political views about the impact of erasing sex on their rights to single sex spaces without naming sex. I don't think his view of 'balancing' has ANY weight. https://t.co/fh5hVg...

April 28th @ 8:28 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

25 posts today

No, what you call 'misgendering' is actually "describing someone according to their sex." You see how our bit actually explains what the action is in relation to reality and yours gives it a rhetorical label that means 'sin'? https://t.co/N6uZ09...

April 28th @ 8:25 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

25 posts today

NOTE: When people claim that the GRA has no effect on women's rights and we are all being evil harpies getting our knickers in a twist, and ALSO claim that the GRA REDEFINES SEX IN LAW AS GENDER IDENTITY and that therefore female people no longer ...

April 28th @ 7:09 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

25 posts today

This is true. Let us mark that today Butler's shit reading of Beauvoir reached an English court in support of the proposition that female people do not exist in law and we are not allowed to mention their existence as a class. Thank you Judy! ...

April 28th @ 6:59 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

25 posts today

Yes female people are being superior by asserting they are female, which is the reason they have been discriminated against for millennia. There is NOT two classes of women. There would never even have been the suggestion there was had you not ...

April 28th @ 6:52 am |